[Jump to the main content of this page]
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Burned Area Emergency Response Tools |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
BAER Tools ->
Post-Fire Road Treatment Tools ->
Post-Fire Peak Flow and Erosion Estimation ->
Curve Number Methods ->
Example
Example Results for Curve Number Methods: the 2005 Blackerby Fire in the Nez Perce National Forest, Idaho The Blackerby Fire on the Nez Perce National Forest near Grangeville, Idaho occurred in August 2005. On 19 May 2006, a 0.79-inch precipitation event with a 30-minute duration occurred over a portion of the burned area. The precipitation event was equivalent to a 25-year, 30-minute storm event as determined from the NOAA Atlas 2 (Miller and others 1973).
The NRCS CN flood flow model results used in the BAER analysis (using FIRE HYDRO) were for a 25-year return event and based on the assumption of limited soil and vegetation regeneration during the first year after the fire (Gerhardt, 2006). The observed flood discharge value was 71 cfs or 56 cfsm (cfs mi-2). This observed flood discharge was half that of predicted flow. Additionally, the observed debris flow discharge was 620 cfs, or 492 cfsm, indicating that debris flow discharge was nearly an order of magnitude greater than the flood discharge.
REFERENCES
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
top | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
USDA Forest Service - RMRS - Moscow Forestry Sciences
Laboratory |